Sexual Orientation and Choice

Authors

  • Saray Ayala California State University, Sacramento.

Keywords:

sexual orientation, choice, interpretation, sex/gender, conceptualization, categorization

Abstract

Is there a choice in sexual orientation? [Wilkerson, William S. (2009): “Is It a Choice? Sexual Orientation as Interpretation”. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 40. No. 1, p. 97–116] argues that sexual desires require interpretation in order to be fully constituted, and therefore sexual orientation is at least partially constituted by choice. [Díaz-León, Esa (2017): “Sexual Orientation as Interpretation? Sexual Desires, Concepts, and Choice”; In: Journal of Social Ontology] critically assesses Wilkerson’s argument, concluding that we still lack a good argument for the claim that choice plays a role in sexual orientation. Here I examine Díaz-León’s response to Wilkerson. I introduce what I call the conceptual act theory of sexual orientation, and argue that even if interpretation were not necessary to constitute sexual desires, it is a necessary element to constitute what we call sexual orientation. However, I conclude that even if we agree that interpretation is involved in sexual orientation, it does not follow that there is a choice involved.

References

Barrett, Lisa F. (2006): “Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion”. In: Personality and Social Psychology Review 10. No. 1, p. 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2

Barrett, Lisa F., Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhall and Lawrence W. Barsalou (2015): The Conceptual Act Theory: A Road Map. In: Barrett L. F., and J. A. Russell (Eds.): The psychological construction of emotion. New York: Guilford, p. 83–110.

Bettcher, Talia Mae (2014): “When Selves Have Sex: What the Phenomenology of Trans Sexuality Can Teach Us About Sexual Orientation”, In: Journal of Homosexuality 61. No. 5, p. 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.865472

Borges, Jorge Luis (1960): El Hacedor. Madrid: Alianza.

Dembroff, Robin (2016): “What is Sexual Orientation?”. In: Philosophers’ Imprint 16. No. 3, p. 1–27.

Díaz-León, Esa (2017): “Sexual Orientation as Interpretation? Sexual Desires, Concepts, and Choice”; In: Journal of Social Ontology. 3. No. 2, p. 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2016-0028

Díaz-León, Esa (forthcoming): “Sexual Orientations: The Desire View”. In: Maitra, Keya, and McWeeny, Jennifer (Eds.): Feminist Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fischer, John Martin (1994): The Metaphysics of Free Will. Oxford: Blackwell.

Frankfurt, Harry (1969): “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”. In:Journal of Philosophy 66, p. 829–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2023833

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter Todd, and The ABC Research Group (1999): Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, Gerd (2008): “Why Heuristics Work”. In: Perspectives in Psychological Science 3. No. 1, p. 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x

Hitchcock, Christopher and Joshua Knobe (2009): “Cause and Norm”. In: The Journal of Philosophy 106. No.11, p. 587–612. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20091061128

Liberman, A. M., K. S. Harris, H. S. Hoffman and B. C. Griffith (1957): “The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries”, In: Journal of Experimental Psychology 54, p. 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044417

Nozick, Robert (1981): Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Philips, Jonathan, Jamie Luguri and Joshua Knobe, (2015): “Unifying Morality’s Influence on Non-Moral Judgements: The Relevance of Alternative Possibilities”. In: Cognition 145, p. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.001

Stein, Edward (1999): The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stein, Edward (2011): “Sexual Orientations, Rights, and the Body: Immutability, Essentialism, and Nativism”. In: Social Research 78. No. 2, p. 633–658.

Vasilyeva, Nadya Y., Daniel Wilkenfeld and Tania Lombrozo (2017): “Contextual Utility Affects the Perceived Quality of Explanations”. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1275-y

Vernallis, Kayley (2013): “Bisexual Marriage”. In: Power, N. Halwani R., and Soble, A. (Eds.): The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, 6th edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, p. 215–32.

Wilkerson, William S. (2009): “Is It a Choice? Sexual Orientation as Interpretation”. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 40. No. 1, p. 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01440.x

Wilkerson, William S. (2013): “What is ‘Sexual Orientation’?” In: Power, N. Halwani R., and Soble, A. (Eds.): The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, 6th edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 195–213.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-04

How to Cite

Ayala, Saray. 2017. “Sexual Orientation and Choice”. Journal of Social Ontology 3 (2). Vienna, Austria:249-65. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6815.

Issue

Section

Articles