Social Science and the Naturalization of Social Metaphysics
Old Biases and New Advances
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25365/jso-2025-8813Keywords:
naturalized metaphysics, social ontology, naturalizing social ontology, scientific realism, archaeologyAbstract
Some philosophers challenge the advisability of naturalizing social metaphysics by appeal to social science. They argue that social science fails to meet criteria for realist commitment, such as unity and novel predictive power, and that social science would therefore be a poor anchor for naturalization projects. These skeptical challenges are rooted in traditions in the philosophy of science that have held the social sciences in low esteem. Through a case study that highlights the ways in which archaeology is methodologically converging on hard science, I show that the old philosophical bias against social science is outmoded. I suggest that at least some of the methodological advances of archaeology and other social sciences are epistemologically significant and should be taken to bear on the question of realism. However, I conclude with the thought that realist commitment need not be a precondition for naturalization. The paper therefore accomplishes two main things: 1) it removes argumentative roadblocks to the use of social science in the naturalization of social metaphysics, and 2) it motivates a higher estimation of the epistemological credentials of social science as compared with more skeptical traditions.
References
Adjerid, Idris and Ken Kelley (2018). “Big Data in Psychology: A Framework for Research Advancement”. American Psychologist 73(7), pp. 899–917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/AMP0000190.
Ardila, Rubén (2020). “Applied Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and New Fields of Psychological Technology”. In: International Association of Applied Psychology. Ed. by Helio Carpintero, Rubén Ardila, and Ana M. Jacó-Vilela. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 197–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119680673.CH13.
Baker, Lynne Rudder (2019). “Just What Is Social Ontology?” Journal of Social Ontology 5(1), pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JSO-2019-2001.
Bakker, Ryan and Keith T Poole (2013). “Bayesian Metric Multidimensional Scaling”. Political Analysis 21(1), pp. 125–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/PAN/MPS039.
Barnes, Corey (2021). “Of Races: From Social Constructionism to Biological Realism”. Journal of Philosophy and Culture 9(2), pp. 28–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JPC2021.0090.
Barton, Michael (2013). “Stories of the Past or Science of the Future? Archaeology and Computational Social Science”. In: Computational Approaches to Archaeological Spaces. Ed. by Andrew Bevan and Mark Lake. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc, pp. 151–178.
Benavides López, J A et al. (2016). “3D Modelling in Archaeology: The Application of Structure from Motion Methods to the Study of the Megalithic Necropolis of Panoria (Granada, Spain)”. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10, pp. 495–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2016.11.022.
Berinsky, Adam J, Gregory A Huber, and Gabriel S Lenz (2012). “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk”. Political Analysis 20(3), pp. 351–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057.
Bonica, Adam (2013). “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace”. American Journal of Political Science 57(2), pp. 294–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/AJPS.12014.
Bottom, William P et al. (2000). “The Institutional Effect on Majority Rule Instability: Bicameralism in Spatial Policy Decisions”. American Journal of Political Science 44(3), pp. 523–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669262.
Boyd, Danah and Kate Crawford (2012). “Critical Questions for Big Data”. Information, Communication and Society 15(5), pp. 662–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
Bryant, Amanda (2020). “Keep the Chickens Cooped: The Epistemic Inadequacy of Free Range Metaphysics”. Synthese 197, pp. 1867–1887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1398-8.
Bryant, Amanda (2024). “Naturalized Metaphysics without Scientific Realism”. Argumenta 10(1), pp. 13–33. DOI: http://doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/20240.bry.
Chen, Eric Evan and Sean P. Wojcik (2016). “A Practical Guide to Big Data Research in Psychology”. Psychological Methods 21(4), pp. 458–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000111.
Chimenti, Robert (2020). “Spectroscopy Uncovers the Hidden in Art and Archaeology”. LaserFocusWorld. URL: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/spectroscopy/article/14183101/spectroscopy-uncovers-the-hidden-in-art-and-archaeology.
Cooper, Anwen, Miranda Creswell, et al. (2021). English Landscapes and Identities: Investigating Landscape Change from 1500 BC to AD 1086. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870623.001.0001.
Cooper, Anwen and Chris Green (2016). “Embracing the Complexities of ‘Big Data’ in Archaeology: The Case of the English Landscape and Identities Project”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23(1), pp. 271–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10816-015-9240-4.
Cowls, John and Ralph Schroeder (2015). “Causation, Correlation, and Big Data in Social Science Research”. Policy and Internet 7(4), pp. 447–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.100.
Cranmer, Skyler J and Bruce A Desmarais (2017). “What Can We Learn from Predictive Modeling?” Political Analysis 25(2), pp. 145–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/PAN.2017.3.
Currie, Adrian (2018). Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Djindjian, F (2009). “The Golden Years for Mathematics and Computers in Archaeology (1965–1985)”. Archeologia e Calcolatori 20, pp. 61–73.
Fisher, Tim (2021). “Terabytes, Gigabytes, and Petabytes: How Big Are They?” Lifewire Tech for Humans. URL: https://www.lifewire.com/terabytes-gigabytes-amp-petabytes-how-big-are-they-4125169.
González-Bailón, Sandra (2013). “Social Science in the Era of Big Data”. Policy and Internet 5(2), pp. 147–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI328.
González-Bailón, Sandra et al. (2014). “Assessing the Bias in Communication Networks Sampled from Twitter”. Social Networks 38, pp. 16–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1212.1684.
Guala, Francesco (2007). “The Philosophy of Social Science: Metaphysical and Empirical”. Philosophy Compass 2(6), pp. 954–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00095.x.
Gujarati, Damodar, Dawn Porter, and Sangeetha Gunasekar (2017). Basic Econometrics. 5th edition. New York City: McGraw-Hill Education.
Hawley, Katherine (2018). “Social Science as a Guide to Social Metaphysics?” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 49, pp. 187–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-017-9389-5.
Hibbert, Ruth (2016). “What Is an Immature Science?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2016.1240433.
Hindman, Matthew (2015). “Building Better Models: Prediction, Replication, and Machine Learning in the Social Sciences”. The Annals of the American Academy 659, pp. 48–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570279.
Jungherr, Andreas and Yannis Theocharis (2017). “The Empiricist’s Challenge: Asking Meaningful Questions in Political Science in the Age of Big Data”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14(2), pp. 97–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1312187.
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (2013). Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998553.
Khalifa, Kareem and Richard Lauer (2021). “Do the Social Sciences Vindicate Race’s Reality?” Philosophers’ Imprint 21(21), pp. 1–17.
Killick, D (2005). “Comments IV: Is There Really a Chasm between Archaeological Theory and Archaeological Science?” Archaeometry 47(1), pp. 185–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.195-4.x.
Kincaid, Harold (1996). Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625442.
Kincaid, Harold (2000). “Global Arguments for Local Realism about the Social Sciences”. Philosophy of Science 67(S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000), pp. 667–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/392854.
Kincaid, Harold (2016). “Debating the Reality of Social Classes”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46(2), pp. 189–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393115614254.
Kincaid, Harold (2018). “Debating the Reality of Race, Caste, and Ethnicity”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48(2), pp. 139–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393117742878.
Kincaid, Harold (2024). “A Naturalist Approach to Social Ontology”. Synthese 203(27), pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04432-8.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ladyman, James et al. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001.
Lauer, Richard (2022). “Motivating a Pragmatic Approach to Naturalized Social Ontology”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53, pp. 403–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09581-3.
Lauer, Richard and Kareem Khalifa (2023). “Should Ordinary Race Talk be Ontologically Privileged? Moving Social Science into the Philosophical Mainstream”. Synthese 202(144), pp. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04361-6.
Lohse, Simon (2017). “Pragmatism, Ontology, and Philosophy of the Social Sciences in Practice”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47(1), pp. 3–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116654869.
Maddy, Penelope (2007). Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273669.001.0001.
Marres, Noortje (2017). Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
Maudlin, Tim (2007). The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001.
Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology (n.d.). ARCHAEOGLOBE: Global Collaborations to Assess Past Human Impacts. URL: https://archaeoglobe.com/.
McCoy, Mark (2017). “Geospatial Big Data and Archaeology: Prospects and Problems Too Great to Ignore”. Journal of Archaeological Science 84, pp. 74–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.003.
McFarland, Daniel A, Kevin Lewis, and Amir Goldberg (2016). “Sociology in the Era of Big Data: The Ascent of Forensic Social Science”. The American Sociologist 47, pp. 12–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9291-8.
Medio, Alfredo (2009). “Mathematical Models in Economics”. In: Mathematical Models. Volume 3. Ed. by Jerzy Filar and Jacek Krawczyk. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd, pp. 222–236.
Melnyk, Andrew (2013). “Can Metaphysics Be Naturalized? And If So, How?” In: Scientific Metaphysics. Ed. by Don Ross, James Ladyman, and Harold Kincaid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696499.003.0004
Montgomery, Jacob M., Florian M. Hollenbach, and Michael D. Ward (2012). “Improving Predictions Using Ensemble Bayesian Model Averaging”. Political Analysis 20(3), pp. 271–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/PAN/MPS002.
Morganti, Matteo (2013). Combining Science and Metaphysics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002693.
Murthy, Dhiraj (2008). “Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research”. Sociology 42(5), pp. 837–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094565.
Mützel, Sophie (2015). “Facing Big Data: Making Sociology Relevant”. Big Data and Society 2(2), pp. 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715599179.
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson (2017). Biology and Feminism: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316106280.
Nesselroade, John and Raymond Cattell (1988). Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. New York: Plenum Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5.
Newton, Howard (2005). “A Conversation with William Gould”. The Stata Journal 5(1), pp. 19–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0500500103.
Ney, Alyssa (2012). “Neo-Positivist Metaphysics”. Philosophical Studies 160, pp. 53–78. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9912-9.
Nsanziyera, Ange et al. (2018). “GIS and Remote-Sensing Application in Archaeological Site Mapping in the Awsard Area (Morocco)”. Geosciences 8(207), pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES8060207.
Pilnick, Alison (2013). “Sociology without Frontiers? On the Pleasures and Perils of Interdisciplinary Research”. Sociological Research Online 18(3), pp. 97–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/SRO.3108.
Pluciennik, Mark (2006). “Clash of Cultures? Archaeology and Genetics”. Documenta Praehistorica 33, pp. 39–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.33.6.
Pollard, A. Mark and Peter Bray (2007). “A Bicycle Made for Two? The Integration of Scientific Techniques Into Archaeological Interpretation”. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, pp. 245–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094354.
Reitz, Elizabeth and Elizabeth Wing (2008). Zooarchaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841354.
Renfrew, Colin (2010). “Archaeogenetics – Towards a ‘New Synthesis’?” Current Biology 20, pp. 162–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.056.
Renfrew, Colin and K Boyle (2000). Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population Prehistory of Europe. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
Rosenberg, Alexander (1980). Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rosenberg, Alexander (1992). Economics : Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ross, Don (2023). “Scientific Metaphysics and Social Science”. Synthese 202(146), pp. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04358-1.
Sarkia, Matti and Tuukka Kaidesoja (2023). “Two Approaches to Naturalistic Social Ontology”. Synthese 201(104), pp. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04105-6.
Saunders, Daniel (2020). “Optimism for Naturalized Social Metaphysics: A Reply to Hawley”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50(2), pp. 138–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393119894901.
Scholz, Oliver R (2018). “Inductive Social Metaphysics—A Defence of Inference to the Best Explanation in the Metaphysics of Social Reality: Comments on Katherine Hawley”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 49(2), pp. 199–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-018-9399-y.
Shah, Dhavan, Joseph Cappella, and W Russell Neuman (2015). “Big Data, Digital Media, and Computational Social Science: Possibilities and Perils”. The Annals of the American Academy 659, pp. 6–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215572084.
Spencer, Quayshawn (2014). “A Radical Solution to the Race Problem”. Philosophy of Science 81(5), pp. 1025–1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/677694.
Spencer, Quayshawn (2015). “Philosophy of Race Meets Population Genetics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52, pp. 46–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.04.003.
Stephens, Lucas et al. (2019). “Archaeological Assessment Reveals Earth’s Early Transformation through Land Use”. Science 365(6456), pp. 897–902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1192.
Tahko, Tuomas and Matteo Morganti (2017). “Moderately Naturalistic Metaphysics”. Synthese 194(7), pp. 2557–2580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1068-2.
Thomasson, Amie (2003). “Foundation for a Social Ontology”. ProtoSociology 18, pp. 269–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology200318/199.
University of Warwick (n.d.). Governance of Livestock Disease (GoLD). URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/gld/.
VanValkenburgh, Parker and J. Andrew Dufton (2020a). “Archaeological Vision in the Age of Big Data”. Journal of Field Archaeology 45(S1), pp. 1–110.
VanValkenburgh, Parker and J. Andrew Dufton (2020b). “Big Archaeology: Horizons and Blindspots”. Journal of Field Archaeology 45(S1), pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1714307.
Verhagen, Philip and Thomas G Whitley (2011). “Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: A Live Report from the Scene”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19(1), pp. 49–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10816-011-9102-7.
Wiener, Janet and Nathan Bronson (2014). “Facebook’s Top Open Data Problems”. Facebook Research. URL: https://research.fb.com/blog/2014/10/facebook-s-top-open-data-problems/.
Yaworsky, Peter M et al. (2020). “Advancing Predictive Modeling in Archaeology: An Evaluation of Regression and Machine Learning Methods on the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument”. PLoS ONE 15(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0239424.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amanda Bryant (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
