Social Theory for Quantum Times
Discourse Meets Agential Realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25365/jso-2024-7856Keywords:
discourse, post-structuralism, materiality, social theory, agential realismAbstract
Discourse theories and methods have been a staple in social and political studies for a long time. However, even in the most advanced accounts of post-structuralist ontology and epistemology within the social sciences, materiality is somewhat under-theorized, weakening discursive approaches and leading to a sense that social and material/natural worlds are in some significant way separate and operate differently. In this paper Karen Barad’s theory of agential realism, which builds on quantum physics, is deployed to show that this need not be the case. The paper explores the question of materiality and matter and its relation to discourse, by bringing Barad’s insight and a strand of post-structuralist discourse theory together. I argue that Barad’s agential realism can account for how matter matters also in post-structuralist social science, by discussing the similarities of the two approaches and how they work together. The article contributes to the discussion on new materialism, the question of agency and structure and to the onto-epistemology of social sciences and the concept of matter.
References
Aradau, Claudia (2010). “Security That Matters: Critical Infrastructure and Objects of Protection””. Security Dialogue 41(5), pp. 491–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610382687.
Barad, Karen (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
Battin, M Pabst (2005). Ending Life: Ethics and the Way We Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Calvert-Minor, Chris (2014). “Epistemological Misgivings of Karen Barad’s ‘Posthumanism’”.
Human Studies 37(1), pp. 123–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9285-x.
Carpentier, Nico (2017). The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang.
Carpentier, Nico (2020). “Putting a Non-Essentialist Ontology to Work”. Conjunctions 7(1), pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/tjcp.v7i1.119816.
Coole, Diana, Samantha Frost, and ., eds. (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham / London: Duke University Press.
De Freitas, Elisabeth (2017). “Karen Barad’s Quantum Ontology and Posthuman Ethics: Rethinking the Concept of Relationality”. Qualitative Inquiry 23(9), pp. 741–748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725359.
Fairchild, Nikki and Carol Taylor (2019). “Barad, Karen”. In: SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Ed. by Paul Atkinson et al. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036808757.
Gamble, Christopher N, Joshua S Hanan, and Thomas Nail (2019). “What Is New Materialism?”
Angelaki 24(6), pp. 111–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704.
Glynos, Jason and David Howarth (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
Glynos, Jason and David Howarth (2008). “Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualized self-interpretations”. Political studies review 6, pp. 155–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2008.00149.x.
Højgaard, Lis and Dorte Marie Søndergaard (2011). “Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses”. Theory & Psychology 21(3), pp. 338–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965.
Hoppania, Hanna-Kaisa and Tiina Vaittinen (2015). “A Household Full of Bodies: Neoliberalism, Care and ;the Political”. Global Society 29(1), pp. 70–88.
Hoppe, Katharina and Thomas Lemke (2015). “Die Macht der Materie”. Soziale Welt(66), pp. 261–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2015-3-261.
Howarth, David (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Howarth, David (2010). “Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies”. Critical Policy Studies 3(3-4), pp. 309–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619725.
Howarth, David (2013). Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Subjectivity and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137266989.
Howarth, David, Jason Glynos, and Steven Griggs (2016). “Discourse, explanation and critique”. Critical Policy Studies 10(1), pp. 99–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618.
Howarth, David and Steven Griggs (2012). “Poststructuralist policy analysis: discourse hegemony and critical explanation”. In: The argumentative turn revisited: public policy as communicative practice. Ed. by F Fischer and H Gottweiss. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 305–342.
Jacobs, Thomas (2019). “Poststructuralist discourse theory as an independent paradigm for studying institutions: Towards a new definition of ‘discursive construction’ in institutional analysis”. Contemporary Political Theory 18, pp. 379–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0279-3.
Johanna, Oksala (2011). “How is feminist metaphysics possible? A Foucauldian intervention”.
Feminist Theory 12(3), pp. 281–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700111417667.
Laclau, Ernesto (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe (2001[1985]). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Lemke, Thomas (2015). “New Materialisms: Foucault and the ‘Government of Things’”. Theory, Culture & Society 32(4), pp. 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413519340.
Lemke, Thomas (2021). The Government of Things: Foucault and the New Materialisms. New York: New York University Press.
Nyckel, Thomas (2022). Der agentielle Realismus Karen Barads. Ed. by and others. Vol. 101.
Edition Medienwissenschaft. Transcript Verlag.
Panizza, Francisco and Romina Miorelli (2013). “Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory”. Political Studies 61(2), pp. 301–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00967.x.
Rovelli, Carlo (2020). Helgoland. The Strange and Beautiful Story of Quantum Physics. Dublin: Penguin Books.
Rovelli, Carlo (2022). The Big idea: why relationships are key to existence. Accessed 10 July 2023. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/sep/05/the-big-idea-why-relationships-are- the-key-to-existence.
Stanford, Joseph (2016). “Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict”. Frontiers in Public Health 4(27). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00027.
West, Karen (2011). “Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis”. Critical Policy Studies 5(4), pp. 414–433. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.628033.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanna-Kaisa Hoppania
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
