Human-managed soils and soil-managed humans: An interactive account of perspectival realism for soil management

Authors

  • Catherine Kendig

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25365/jso-2024-7690

Keywords:

value-laden ontologies, perspectivism, soil health, land capability classification, soil ontologies, ethnopedology, epistemology of agriculture, agricultural categories

Abstract

What is philosophically interesting about how soil is managed and categorized? This paper begins by investigating how different soil ontologies develop and change as they are used within different social communities. Analyzing empirical evidence from soil science, ethnopedology, sociology, and agricultural extension reveals that efforts to categorize soil are not limited to current scientific soil classifications but also include those based in social ontologies of soil. I examine three of these soil social ontologies: (1) local and Indigenous classifications farmers and farming communities use to conceptualize their relationships with soil in their fields; (2) categorizations ascribed to farmers in virtue of their agricultural goals and economic priorities relied upon in sociological research; and (3) federal agency classifications of land capability employed by agricultural scientists. Studying the interplay of these social ontologies shows how assessing soil properties and capabilities are the result of previous agricultural strategies informed by culture, agroecological history, weather, soil biodiversity, crop rotation, and the goals held by decision-makers. The paper then identifies the soil relationships and interactions that constitute ontology-making activities. Building on recent work, I outline a novel interactive account of perspectival realism grounded in agricultural extension research and ethnopedological data that captures the haptic nature of farmers’ soil strategies. This interactive account explains how ontologies are chosen, why they are chosen, and how they interact and inform soil management decision-making. The paper concludes by examining the values laden in these ontologies and those which are causally implicated in the choice of soil management strategies.

References

Ackerknecht, Erwin Heinz (1971). Medicine and Ethnology: Selected Essays. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana M, Silvia Waisse, and Márcia H. M. Ferraz (2013). “From Shelves to Cyberspace: Organization of Knowledge and the Complex Identity of History of Science”. Isis 104(3), pp. 551–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/673274.

Arteaga, Juanma Sánchez (2017). “Biological Discourses on Human Races and Scientific Racism in Brazil (1832–1911)”. Journal of the History of Biology 50(2), pp. 267–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9445-8.

Bala, Arun and George Gheverghese Joseph (2007). “Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science: The Possibility of Dialogue”. Race & Class 49(1), pp. 39–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396807080067.

Bonneuil, Christophe (2002). “The Manufacture of Species: Kew Gardens, the Empire, and the Standardisation of Taxonomic Practices in Late Nineteenth-Century Botany”. In: Instruments, Travel and Science. Ed. by Marie Bourguet, Christian Licoppe, and H. Otto Sibum. London: Routledge, pp. 201–227.

Bonneuil, Christophe (2019). “Seeing Nature as a ‘Universal Store of Genes’: How Biological Diversity Became ‘Genetic Resources,’ 1890–1940”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 75, pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.12.002.

Boumediene, Samir (2016). La colonisation du savoir: Une histoire des plantes médicinales du “Nouveau monde”. Vaulx-en-Velin: Monde a Faire.

Boumediene, Samir (2020). “La americanización imposible: la expedición de Francisco Hernández y los saberes indios”. In: Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos [Online], Colloques. Accessed July 6, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/nuevomundo.79750.

Breitbach, Ulrike B et al. (2013). “Amazonian Brazilian Medicinal Plants Described by CFP von Martius in the 19th Century”. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 147(1), pp. 180–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.02.030.

Briggs, John and Joanne Sharp (2004). “Indigenous Knowledges and Development: A Postcolonial Caution”. Third World Quarterly 25(4), pp. 661–676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590410001678915.

Bryson, Alexander (1849). “Medicine and medical statistics”. In: A Manual of Scientific Enquiry: Prepared for the Use of Her Majesty’s Navy and Adapted for Travellers in General. Ed. by John F. W. Herschel. London: John Murray, pp. 445–464.

Carneiro Da Cunha, Manuela (2018). Cultura com aspas. São Paulo: Ubu Editora. Clastres, Pierre (2012). A Sociedade Contra O Estado. São Paulo: Cosac & Naify.

Cornish, Caroline (2017). “Botany behind Glass: The Vegetable Kingdom on Display at Kew’s Museum of Economic Botany”. In: Science Museums in Transition: Cultures of Display in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America. Ed. by Carin Berkowitz and Bernard Lightman. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 188–214.

De Castro, Eduardo Viveiros (1992). From the Enemy’s Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazonian Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Drayton, Richard (2000). Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the ‘Improvement’ of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Eisner, Thomas (1994). “Chemical Prospecting: A Global Imperative”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 138(3), pp. 385–393.

Ellen, Roy (2003). “Variation and Uniformity in the Construction of Biological Knowledge Across Cultures”. In: Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures, Science Across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science. Ed. by Helaine Selin. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 47–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0149-5.

Ellen, Roy (2016). “Is There a Role for Ontologies in Understanding Plant Knowledge Systems?” Journal of Ethnobiology 36(1), pp. 10–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-36.1.10.

Ellen, Roy, Peter Parkes, and Alan Bicker (2000). Indigenous Enviromental Knowledge and Its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Escobar, Arturo (1998). “Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements”. Journal of Political Ecology 5(1), pp. 53–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v5i1.21397.

Fabian, Johannes (2002). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. Columbia University Press.

Ford, Richard (1994). The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany. 2nd ed. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Foucault, Michel (1994). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.

Gil-Riaño, Sebastián (2018). “Relocating Anti-Racist Science: The 1950 UNESCO Statement on Race and Economic Development in the Global South”. The British Journal for the History of Science 51(2), pp. 281–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087418000286.

Gruber, Jacob (1970). “Ethnographic Salvage and the Shaping of Anthropology”. American Anthropologist 72(6), pp. 1289–1299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1970.72.6.02a00040.

Gruzinski, Serge (1988). La colonisation de l’imaginaire: sociétés indigènes et occidentalisation dans le Mexique espagnol, XVIe-XVIIIe siècle.

Hamilton, A C et al. (2003). “The purposes and teaching of Applied Ethnobotany”. In: People and Plants working paper 11. Godalming: WWF.

Harding, Sandra (1997). “Is Modern Science an Ethno-Science? Rethinking Epistemological Assumptions”. In: Science and Technology in a Developing World. Ed. by Terry Shinn, Jack Spaapen, and Venni Krishna. Springer, pp. 37–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2948-2_2.

Harschberger, John (1896). “The Purposes of Ethnobotany”. Botanical Gazette 21, pp. 146–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/327316.

Hayden, Cori (2003). When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216362.

Hooker, William (1849). “Botany”. In: A Manual of Scientific Enquiry: Prepared for the Use of Her Majesty’s Navy and Adapted for Travellers in General. Ed. by John F. W. Herschel. London: John Murray, pp. 400–422.

Hviding, Edvard (2003). “Nature, Culture, Magic, Science: On Meta-Languages for Comparison in Cultural Ecology”. In: Nature and Society. Ed. by Philippe Descola and Gisli Palsson. London: Routledge, pp. 175–194.

Kuper, Adam (2003). “The Return of the Native”. Current Anthropology 44(3), pp. 389–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/368120.

Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1966). The Savage Mind. Translated by George Weidenfeld. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Martius, Carl F ([1844]1939). Natureza, Doenças, Medicina e Remédios dos Índios Brasileiros. Translated by Pirajá da Silva. São Paulo: Nacional.

Martius, Carl F (1843). Systema materiae medicae vegetabilis brasiliensis. Leipzig: Frid Fleischer.

Martius, Carl F (1844). Das Naturell, die Krankenheiten, das Ärzthum und Heilmittel der Uhrbewohner Brasiliens. Munich: Druck der Wolfschen Buchdruckerei.

Martius, Carl F (1992). Frei Apolônio: Um Romance do Brasil. Translated by Erwin Theodor. São Paulo: Brasiliense.

McAlvay, Alex et al. (2021). “Ethnobiology Phase VI: Decolonizing Institutions”. Journal of Ethnobiology 41(2), pp. 170–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.170.

Nadasdy, Paul (2005). “Transcending the Debate over the Ecologically Noble Indian: Indigenous Peoples and Environmentalism”. Ethnohistory 52(2), pp. 291–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-52-2-291.

Olsson, Shannon B and The Bengaluru Consortium (2017). “New Frontiers for Chemical Ecology: Reaffirming a Commitment to the Göteborg Resolution”. Journal of Chemical Ecology 43(1), pp. 2–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0813-9.

Porto-Gonçalves, Carlos Walter (2012). “A ecologia política na América Latina: reapropriação social da natureza e reinvenção dos territórios”. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis 9(1), pp. 16–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2012v9n1p16.

Powers, Stephen (1875). “Aboriginal botany”. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 5, pp. 373–379.

Raina, Dhruv and Anirban Chakraborti (2020). “The Ascent of the Indigenous: The Changing Context of Social Theory and Policy in the Making of a Research Field”. SSRN Scholarly Paper, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556882.

Redford, Kent H. and Christine Padoch, eds. (1992). Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Working from Traditional Resource Use. New York: Columbia University Press.

Roth, Wolff-Michael (2019). “Ethnoscience”. In: SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Ed. by Paul Atkinson et al. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 1–10. Salick, Jan, Katie Konchar, and Mark Nesbitt (2014). Curating Biocultural Collections: A Handbook. London: Kew Publishing.

Scherer-Warren, Ilse (2010). “Movimentos sociais e pós-colonialismo na América Latina”. Ciências Sociais Unisinos 46(1), pp. 18–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/167.

Schultes, R (1976). “Richard Spruce and the Ethnobotany of the Northwest Amazon”. Rhodora 78(813), pp. 65–72.

Schultes, R (1978a). “Richard Spruce and the Potential for European Settlement of the Amazon: An Unpublished Letter”. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 77(2), pp. 131–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1978.tb01380.x.

Schultes, R (1978b). “An Unpublished Letter by Richard Spruce on the Theory of Evolution”. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10(2), pp. 159–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00010.x.

Schultes, R and Robert Raffauf (1990). The Healing Forest: Medicinal and Toxic Plants of the Northwest Amazonia. Portland: Dioscorides Press.

Schultes, R and Siri von Reis (2008). Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline. Portland: Timber Press.

Scott, James C (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Shinn, T., J. Spaapen, and V. V. Krishna, eds. (1997). Science and Technology in a Developing World. Dordrecht: Springer.

Spruce, Richard (1849). A Manual of Scientific Inquiry: Prepared for the Use of Her Majesty’s Navy and Adapted for Travelers in General.

Spruce, Richard (1853). Spruce to Sir William Jackson Hooker, 27 June 1853. From Library and Archives at Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Directors’ Correspondence 71/368.

Spruce, Richard (1858[1908]). “Spruce to George Bentham, 2 November 1858”. In: Notes of a botanist on the Amazon and Andes. Ed. by A. R. Wallace. London: Macmillan, pp. 217–218.

Spruce, Richard (1874). “On some Remarkable Narcotics of the Amazon Valley and Orinoco”. Ocean Highways: The Geographical Review, pp. 184–193.

Stavenhagen, Rodolfo (1992). “Challenging the Nation-State in Latin America”. Journal of International Affairs 45(2), pp. 421–440.

Trouillot, Michel-Rolph (2003). “Anthropology and the Savage Slot: The Poetics and Politics of Otherness”. In: Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World. Ed. by Michel-Rolph Trouillot. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7–28.

Uchôa, Raphael (2019). “Contextualising the ‘American Man’ in the Atlantic: the case of Carl von Martius and his German and Iberian sources”. Lychnos: An annual for history of ideas and science, pp. 91–109.

Uchôa, Raphael (2021). “From the state of nature to the state of ruins: ‘American race’ and ‘savage knowledge’ according to Carl von Martius”. Annals of Science 79(1), pp. 40–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2021.1990999.

UNESCO (2000). “Science Agenda—Framework for Action”. In: World Conference on Science for the Twenty-first Century: A New Commitment, Budapest. Accessed 15 June, 2021. London: Banson, pp. 476–485. URL: http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/eng/framework.htm.

UNESCO (2002). “Report from the ICSU Study Group on Science and Traditional Knowledge”. In: The World Conference on Science. Accessed 15 June 2021. URL: https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Science-traditional-knowledge.pdf.

UNESCO (2015). Science Report: Towards 2030. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Vitale, Denise and Renata Nagamine (2022). “Towards Another Cosmopolitanism: Transnational Activism of Indigenous Women in Latin America”. Revista Direito GV 18(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202238.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-07

How to Cite

Kendig, Catherine. 2024. “Human-Managed Soils and Soil-Managed Humans: An Interactive Account of Perspectival Realism for Soil Management”. Journal of Social Ontology 10 (2). Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.25365/jso-2024-7690.

Issue

Section

Special Issue Cultures & Ontologies: Empirical, Ethical & Political Consequences