Common Ground Between Social Ontology, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25365/jso-2023-7439Keywords:
Social Kinds, Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual EthicsAbstract
Social objects have become common subjects of interest to both social ontologists and conceptual engineers, but up to this point much of the philosophical work from these two fields has surprisingly been done in isolation from each field. I show how these prolific research fields—social ontology, conceptual engineering, and conceptual ethics—can mutually benefit each other through a unifying model I propose called the 2D-CE model that shows the dependence relations between a given concept, its instantiation conditions, and whatever language represents such devices. This model combines a model from social ontology with insights from conceptual engineering and conceptual ethics into a powerful metaphilosophical tool that highlights the role of social agents for metaphysical and metalinguistic explanation. A major benefit of the model is its utility for not only social philosophy, but for other areas of research beyond the social world.
References
Ball, D (2020). “Revisionary Analysis without Meaning Change (Or, Could Women Be Analytically Oppressed?)” In: Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Ed. by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett. Oxford University Press, pp. 35–58.
Brouwer, T N P A (2022). “Social Inconsistency”. Ergo 9, pp. 19–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.2258.
Burgess, A and D Plunkett (2020). “On the Relation between Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics”. Ratio 33(4), pp. 281–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12265.
Cantalamessa, E A (2021). “Disability Studies, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Activism”. Inquiry 64(1-2), pp. 46–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658630.
Cappelen, Herman (2018). Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001.
Cappelen, H and D Plunkett (2020). “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics”. In: Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Ed. by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001.
Crisp, R (2022). “Towards an Ethics of Conceptual Engineering”. Inquiry, pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2075454.
Epstein, B (2015). The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001.
Epstein, B (2019). “Anchoring versus Grounding: Reply to Schaffer”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99(3), pp. 768–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12644.
Fine, K (2020). “The Identity of Social Groups”. Metaphysics 3(1), pp. 81–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.45.
Isaac, M G (2021). “What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?” Philosophia 49, pp. 2053–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00367-x.
Isaac, M G, S Koch, and R Nefdt (2022). “Conceptual Engineering: a Road Map to Practice”. Philosophy Compass 17(10), e12879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12879.
Kane, L W (2021). “On What We Can Expect from One Another: Reciprocity in Families, Clubs, and Corporations”. Journal of Social Philosophy 52(3), pp. 310–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12435.
Khalidi, M A (2015). “Three Kinds of Social Kinds”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90(1), pp. 96–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12020.
Korman, D Z (2015). Objects: Nothing Out of the Ordinary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732532.001.0001.
Korman, D Z (2020). “The Metaphysics of Establishments”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98(3), pp. 434–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1622140.
“Macquarie ‘Phubbing: A Word Is Born’ // McCann Melbourne (Video)” (2014). 2:27, uploaded by McCann Paris on 26 June 2014, accessed 28 June 2022. URL: https://youtu.be/hLNhKUniaEw.
Oliphint, J S (2022). “Using a Two-dimensional Model from Social Ontology to Explain the Puzzling Metaphysical Features of Words”. Synthese 200, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03716-9.
Passinsky, A (2016). “The Metaphysics of Social Objects”. In: Phd thesis. New York University. Pinder, M (2021). “Conceptual Engineering, Metasemantic Externalism and Speaker-Meaning”. Mind 130(517), pp. 141–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz069.
Podosky, PM C (2022). “Can conceptual engineering actually promote social justice?” Synthese 200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03469-5.
Schaffer, J (2019). “Anchoring as grounding: On Epstein’s the ant trap”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99, pp. 749–767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12645.
Schroeder, M (2008). “Having Reasons”. Philosophical Studies 139, pp. 57–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9102-3.
Thomasson, A L (2017). “Metaphysical Disputes and Metalinguistic Negotiation”. Analytic Philosophy 58(1), pp. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12087.
Thomasson, A L (2020). “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work”. In: Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Ed. by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett. Oxford University Press, pp. 435–458.
Wedgwood, R N (forthcoming). Rationality and Belief. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jared Oliphint
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
