Modest Sociality: Continuities and Discontinuities
Keywords:
Michael Bratman, shared agency, joint action, shared representations, discontinuitiesAbstract
A central claim in Michael Bratman’s account of shared agency is that there need be no radical conceptual, metaphysical or normative discontinuity between robust forms of small-scale shared intentional agency, i.e., modest sociality, and individual planning agency. What I propose to do is consider another potential discontinuity, whose existence would throw doubt on his contention that the structure of a robust form of modest sociality is entirely continuous with structures at work in individual planning agency. My main point will be that he may be wrong in assuming that the basic cognitive infrastructure sufficient to support individual agency doesn’t have to be supplemented in significant ways to support shared agency.
References
Atmaca, S., N. Sebanz, W. Prinz, and G. Knoblich (2008): “Action Co-Representation: The Joint SNARC Effect”. In: Social Neuroscience 3. No. 3–4, p. 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910801900908
Bratman, M. (1987): Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bratman, M. (2014): Shared Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001
Brennan, S. E., X. Chen, C. Dickinson, M. Neider, and G. Zelinsky (2007): “Coordinating Cognition: The Costs and Benefits of Shared Gaze During Collaborative Search”. In: Cognition 106, p. 1465–1477.
Gilbert, M. (1992): On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2009): “Shared Intention and Personal Intentions”. In: Philosophical Studies 144, p. 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9372-z
Goodale, M. A. and A. D. Milner (1992): “Separate Visual Pathways for Perception and Action”. In: Trends in neurosciences 15. No. 1, p. 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
Heed, T., B. Habets, N. Sebanz, and G. Knoblich (2010): “Others’ Actions Reduce Crossmodal Integration in Peripersonal Space”. In: Current Biology 20, p. 1345–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.068
Jeannerod, M. (1999): “The 25th Bartlett Lecture. To Act or not to Act: Perspectives on the Representation of Actions”. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A, p. 1–29.
Knoblich, G., S. Butterfill, and N. Sebanz (2011): “Psychological Research on Joint Action: Theory and Data”. In: Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory 54, p. 59–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00003-6
Pezzulo, G., P. Iodice, S. Ferraina, and K. Kessler (2013): “Shared Action Spaces: A Basis Function Framework for Social Re-Calibration of Sensorimotor Representations Supporting Joint Action”. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00800
Prinz, W. (1997): “Perception and Action Planning”. In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9, p. 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752551
Richardson, M. J., K. L. Marsh, R. W. Isenhower, J. R. L. Goodman, and R. C. Schmidt (2007): “Rocking Together: Dynamics of Unintentional and Intentional Interpersonal Coordination”. In: Human Movement Science 26, p. 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
Rizzolatti, G. and C. Sinigaglia (2010): “The Functional Role of the Parieto-Frontal Mirror Circuit: Interpretations and Misinterpretations”. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11, p. 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2805
Schuch, S. and S. P. Tipper (2007): “On Observing Another Person’s Actions: Influences of Observed Inhibition and Errors”. In: Perception & Psychophysics 69, p. 828–837. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193782
Searle, J. (1990): “Collective Intentions and Actions”. In Intentions in Communication P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press, p. 401–416.
Sebanz, N., G. Knoblich, and W. Prinz (2005): “How Two Share a Task: Corepresenting Stimulus–Response Mappings”. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31, p. 1234–1246.
Sebanz, N., G. Knoblich, W. Prinz, and E. Wascher (2006): “Twin Peaks: An ERP Study of Action Planning and Control in Co-Acting Individuals”. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, p. 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859
Tollefsen, D. (2005): “Let’s Pretend: Children and Joint Action”. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35. No. 75, p. 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104271925
Tomasello, M. (2009): Why We Cooperate. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8470.001.0001
Tomasello, M. and M. Carpenter (2007): “Shared Intentionality”. In: Developmental science 10. No. 1, p. 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x
Tsai, C. C., W. J. Kuo, D. L. Hung, and O. J. Tzeng (2008): “Action Co-Representation is Tuned to Other Humans”. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20. No. 11, p. 2015–2024. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20144
van Schie, H. T., R. B. Mars, M. G. Coles, and H. Bekkering (2004): “Modulation of Activity in Medial Frontal and Motor Cortices During Error Observation”. In: Nature neuroscience 7. No. 5, p. 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1239
Wilson, M. and G. Knoblich (2005): “The Case for Motor Involvement In Perceiving Conspecifics”. In: Psychological Bulletin 131. No. 3, p. 460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Elisabeth Pacherie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
