Natural Kinds, Social Constructions, and Ordinary Language

Clarifying the Crisis in the Science of Emotion

Authors

  • Cecilea Mun St. Marys College of Maryland

Keywords:

emotion, social construction, natural kind, philosophy, psychology, interdisciplinary, philosophy of science, Hilary Putnam

Abstract

I argue for the importance of clarifying the distinction between metaphysical, semantic, and meta-semantic concerns in the discourse of what Emotion is. This allows us to see that those involved in the Scientific Emotion Project and the Folk Emotion Project are in fact involved in the same project – the Science of Emotion. It also helps us understand why questions regarding the natural kind status of Emotion, as well as answers to questions regarding the value of ordinary language emotion terms or concepts to emotion research, will not help resolve the observed crisis in the Science of Emotion.

References

Armon-Jones, Claire (1986): “The Thesis of Social Constructionism”. In: Rom Harré (Ed.): The Social Construction of Emotions. New York: Basil Blackwell, p. 32–56.

Averill, J. R. (1980): “A Constructivist View of Emotion”. In: Robert Plutchik and Henry Kellerman (Eds.): Theories of Emotion: Emotion, Theory, Research, and Experience. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1

Barrett, Lisa F. (2006): “Are Emotions Natural Kinds”. In: Perspectives on Psychological Science 1. No. 1, p. 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x

Barrett, Lisa F. (2007a): “The Experience of Emotion”. In: Annual Review of Psychology 58, p. 373–403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709

Barrett, Lisa F. (2007b): “The Science of Emotion: What People Believe, What the Evidence Shows, and Where to Go From Here”. In: James J. Blascovich and Christine R. Hartel (Eds.): Human Behavior in Military Context. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, p. 189–216.

Barrett, Lisa F. (2012): “Emotions Are Real”. In: American Psychological Association 12. No. 3, p. 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027555

Barrett, Lisa F. (2013): “Psychological Construction: The Darwinian Approach to the Science of Emotion”. In: Emotion Review 5. No. 4, p. 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913489753

Barrett, Lisa F., Maria Gendron, and Yang-Ming Huang (2009): “Do Discrete Emotions Exists”. In: Philosophical Psychology 22. No. 4, p. 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903153634

Barrett, Lisa F., Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhal, and Lawrence W. Barsalou. (2015): “The Conceptual Act Theory: A Roadmap”. In: Lisa F. Barrett and James A. Russell (Eds.): The Psychological Construction of Emotion. New York: Guilford Press, p. 83–110.

Ben-Ze’ev, Aaron (2000): The Subtlety of Emotions. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6548.001.0001

Carnap, Rudolf (1938): “Empiricism and the Language of Science”. In: Synthese 3. No. 12, p. 33–35.

Carnap, Rudolf (1955): “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages”. In: Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 6. No. 3, p. 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111546216-004

Charland, Louis C. (2002): “The Natural Kind Status of Emotion”. In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, p. 511–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/53.4.511

Charland, Louis C. (2005): “The Heat of Emotion: Valence and the Demarcation Problem”. In: Journal of Consciousness Studies 12, No. 8–10, p. 82–102.

Colombetti, Giovanna (2009a): “From Affect Programs to Dynamical Discrete Emotions”. In: Philosophical Psychology 22. No. 4, p. 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903153600

Colombetti, Giovanna (2009b): “What Language Does to Feelings”. In: Journal of Consciousness Studies 16, p. 4–26 (post-print).

de Sousa, Ronald (1987): The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5760.001.0001

de Sousa, Ronald (1992): “Emotion”. In: Edward N. Zalta (Ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Spring 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/emotion/.

Ekman, Paul (1992): “An Argument for Basic Emotions”. In: Cognition and Emotion 6. No. 3/4, p. 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068

Ekman, Paul and Daniel Cordaro (2011): “What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic”. In: Emotion Review 3, p. 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740

Goldie, Peter (2000): The Emotions. New York: Clarendon Press.

Greenwood, John D. (1991): The Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionality and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Griffiths, Paul E. (1997): What Emotions Really Are. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226308760.001.0001

Harris, Christine (Ed.) (2010): “Special Section: On Defining Emotion”. In: Emotion Review 2. No. 4, p. 315–402.

Harris, Christine (Ed.) (2012): “Special Section: On Defining Emotion”. In: Emotion Review 4. No. 4, p. 337–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445857

Izzard, Carroll (2009): “Emotion Theory and Research: Highlights, Unanswered Questions, and Emerging Issues”. In: Annual Review of Psychology 60, p. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163539

Ladyman, James (2011): “The Scientistic Stance: The Empirical and Materialist Stances Reconciled”. In: Synthese 178, p. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9513-0

Lazarus, Richard S. and Craig A. Smith (1990): “Emotion and Adaptation”. In: Lawrence A. Pervin (Ed.): Handbook of Personality. New York: Guilford Press.

Levenson, Robert W. (1999): “The Interpersonal Functions of Emotion”. In: Cognition and Emotion 13. No. 5, p. 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379159

Lyons, William E. (1980): Emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609244

Mulligan, Kevin and Klaus Scherer (2012): “Introduction to the Special Selection: On Defining Emotion”. In: Emotion Review 4. No. 4, p. 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445818

Needham, Paul (2002): “The Discovery that Water is H2O”. In: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16. No. 3, p. 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269859022000013300

Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001): Upheavals of Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840715

Ortony, Andrew and Gerald Clore (2015): “Can An Appraisal Model Be Compatible with Psychological Constructionism”. In: Lisa F. Barrett. and James A. Russell (Eds.): The Psychological Construction of Emotion. New York: Guilford Press, p. 503–333.

Panksepp, Jaak (2008): “Carving ‘Natural’ Emotions: ‘Kindly’ from Bottom-up but not Top-down”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28. No. 2, p. 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092065

Prinz, Jesse (2004): Gut Reactions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Putnam, Hilary (1975; reprint 1989): “Explanation and Reference”. In: Hilary Putnam (Ed.): Mind, Language, and Reality. Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 196–214. Citations refer to the reprint edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251.013

Quine, W. V. (1951): “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. In: The Philosophical Review 60. No. 1, p. 20–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906

Quine, W. V. (1957): “The Scope and Language of Science”. In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8. No. 29, p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pncnhw.13

Quine, W. V. (1960a): “Carnap and Logical Truth”. In: Synthese 12. No. 4, p. 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485423

Quine, W. V. (1960b): Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9636.001.0001

Quine, W. V. (1992): Pursuit of Truth (revised edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rorty, Amélie O. (1980). “Explaining Emotions”. In: Amélie O. Rorty (Ed.): Explaining Emotions. Berkeley: University of California Press, p. 103–126.

Russell, James A. (2009): “Emotion, Core Affect, and Psychological Construction”. In: Cognition and Emotion 23, p. 1259–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902809375

Russell, James A. (2010): “Descriptive and Prescriptive Definitions of Emotion”. In: Emotion Review 2, p. 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910374667

Russell, James A. (2012): “Introduction to the Special Selection: On Defining Emotion”. In: Emotion Review 4. No. 4, p. 337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445857

Sarbin, Theodore R. (1986): “Emotion and Act: Roles and Rhetoric”. In: Rom Harré (Ed.): The Social Construction of Emotions. New York: Blackwell, p. 83–97.

Scarantino, Andrea (2012): “How to Define Emotions Scientifically”. In: Emotion Review 4, p. 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445810

Scarantino, Andrea and Paul Griffiths (2011): “Don’t Give Up on Basic Emotions”. In: Emotion Review 3. No. 4, p. 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410745

Scherer, Klaus (2009): “Emotion as Emergent Processes: They Require a Dynamic Computational Architecture”. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, p. 3459–3474. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0141

Solomon, Robert C. (1993): The Passions. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

Wierzbicka, Anna (1999): “Emotional Universals”. In: Language Design 2, p. 23–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521256.007

Wierzbicka, Anna (2009): “Overcoming Anglocentrism in Emotion Research”. In: Emotion Review 1. No. 1, p. 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097179

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1997): Philosophical Investigations. Malden: Blackwell.

Zachar, Peter (2006): “The Classification of Emotion and Scientific Realism”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 26, p. 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091270

Zachar, Peter (2008): “A Triptych on Affective Science: Response to Commentary”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28. No. 2, p. 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092068

Downloads

Published

2016-08-11

How to Cite

Mun, Cecilea. 2016. “Natural Kinds, Social Constructions, and Ordinary Language: Clarifying the Crisis in the Science of Emotion”. Journal of Social Ontology 2 (2). Vienna, Austria:247-69. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6835.

Issue

Section

Special Section: Social Kinds