The Social Ontology of Democracy
Keywords:
social ontology, democratic theory, social interactionism, democracy, political ontologyAbstract
This paper offers an account of the social foundations of a theory of democracy. It purports to show that a social ontology of democracy is the necessary counterpart of a political theory of democracy. It notably contends that decisions concerning basic social ontological assumptions are relevant not only for empirical research, but bear a significant impact also on normative theorizing. The paper then explains why interactionist rather than substantialist social ontologies provide the most promising starting point for building a social ontology of democracy. It then introduces and examines the three notions of habits, patterns of interaction, and forms of social organization, conceived as the main pillars of an interactionist social ontology of democracy and briefly discusses some major implications of this approach for democratic theory.
References
Abbott, A. (1999): Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226222738.001.0001
Abbott, A. (2007): “Mechanisms and Relations”. In: Sociologica 1. No. 2, p. 1–22.
Abbott, A. (2016): Processual Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226336763.001.0001
Achen, C. and L. Bartels (2016): Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882731
Archer, M. (1995): Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675
Bentley, A. (1908): The Process of Government, a Study of Social Pressures by Arthur F. Bentley. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bulmer, M. (1986): The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Camic, C. (1986): “The Matter of Habit”. American Journal of Sociology p. 1039–1087. https://doi.org/10.1086/228386
Collins, R. (2004): Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744
Cooley, C. (1918): Social Process. New York: Scribner’s.
Cutler, A. C. (2003): Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy, Volume 90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550300
Dépelteau, F. (2018): The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9
Dewey, J. (1925): Experience and Nature. The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1927): The Public and its Problems. The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 2. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1928): “Social as a Category”. In: The Monist p. 161–177. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist192838218
Dewey, J. (1939): “Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us”. In: The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (2015): “Lectures in Social and Political Philosophy”. In: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, p. 7–44. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.404
Elder-Vass, D. (2010): The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761720
Emirbayer, M. (1997): “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”. In: American Journal of Sociology 103. No. 2, p. 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
Epstein, B. (2015): The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
Fara, M. (2005): “Dispositions and Habituals”. In: Noûs 39. No. 1, p. 43–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00493.x
Follett, M. P. (1919): “Community is a Process”. In: The Philosophical Review, p. 576–588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2178307
Frega, R. (2015): “The Normative Structure of the Ordinary”. In: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7. No. 1, p. 54–76. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.370
Frega, R. (2017a): “The Normativity of Democracy”. In: European Journal of Political Theory Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18561-9_3
Frega, R. (2017b): “The Wide View of Democracy”. In: Thesis Eleven 140. No. 1, p. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616659959
Frega, R. (2018): “Democracy and the Limits of Political Realism”. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Online First. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1479814
Frega, R. (2019): Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18561-9
Giddens, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goffman, E. (1983): “The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address”. In: American Sociological Review 48. No. 1, p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
Gould, C. (1978): Marx’s Social Ontology: Individuality and Community in Marx’s Theory of Social Reality. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
Gould, C. (1988): Rethinking Democracy. Cambridge: Cambrdge University Press.
Hay, C. (2006): “Political Ontology”. In: R. E. Goodin and C. Tilly (Ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, p. 78–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0004
Hodgson, G. M. (2004): “Reclaiming Habit for Institutional Economics”. In: Journal of Economic Psychology 25. No. 5, p. 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.03.001
James, W. (1950): The Principles of Psychology: In 2 volumes (First ed. 1890 ed.). Dover Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
Kilpinen, E. (2000): The Enormous Fly-Wheel of Society: Pragmatism’s Habitual Conception of Action and Social Theory. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Kolodny, N. (2003): “Love as Valuing a Relationship”. In: The Philosophical Review 112. No. 2, p. 135–189. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-2-135
Korbut, A. (2014): “The Idea of Constitutive Order in Ethnomethodology”. In: European Journal of Social Theory 17. No. 4, p. 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013516057
Koskenniemi, M. (2006): From Apology to Utopia. The structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambrdge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493713
Krisch, N. (2010): Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001
Lefort, C. (1986): Essais sur le politique. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.
Little, D. (2012): “Explanatory Autonomy and Coleman’s Boat”. In: THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27. No. 2, p. 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.3016
MacMullan, T. (2009): Habits of Whiteness. A Pragmatist Reconstruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Marres, N. (2016): Material Participation: Technology, The Environment and Everyday Publics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Merkel, W. (2004): “Embedded and Defective Democracies”. In: Democratization 11. No. 5, p. 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304598
Minow, M. (1986): “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Rober Cover”. In: Yale Law Journal Company 96, p. 1860–1915. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315236353-9
Park, R. and E. Burgess (1921): Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pettit, P. (2005): “Rawls’s political ontology”. In: Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4. No. 2, p. 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05052536
Pettit, P. (2014): “Three Issues in Social Ontology”. See zahle2014rethinking, Chapter 5, p. 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05344-8_5
Popper, K. (1945): The Open Society and its Enemies. Routledge & K. Paul.
Rawls, J. (1955): “Two Concepts of Rules”. In: The Philosophical Review 64. No. 1, p. 3–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182230
Rawls, A. (1987): “The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory”. In: Sociological Theory 5. No. 2, p. 136–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/201935
Rawls, A. (2009): “An Essay on Two Conceptions of Social Order: Constitutive Orders of Action, Objects and Identities vs Aggregated Orders of Individual Action”. In: Journal of Classical Sociology 9. No. 4, p. 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X09344376
Rawls, A. (2010): “Social Order as Moral Order”. In: S. Hitlin and S. Vaisey (Ed.): Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_6
Renault, E. (2016): “Critical Theory and Processual Social Ontology”. In: Journal of Social Ontology 2. No. 1, p. 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0013
Somers, M. R. (1994): “Rights, Relationality, and Membership: Rethinking the Making and Meaning of Citizenship”. In: Law & Social Inquiry 19. No. 1, p. 63–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00390.x
Sullivan, S. (2006): Revealing Whiteness. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Swidler, A. (1986): “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies”. In: American Sociological Review, p. 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
Taylor, C. (1985): Philosophical Papers: Volume 1, Human Agency and Language, Volume 1, Chapter Atomism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173483
Taylor, C. (1995): “Cross-Purposes. The Liberal-Communitarian Debate”. In: Philosophical Arguments, p. 181–203. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Testa, I. (2016): “Dewey’s Social Ontology: A Pragmatist Alternative to Searle’s Approach to Social Reality”. In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25. No. 1, p. 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2016.1260625
Turner, S. (1994): The Social Theory of Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Udehn, L. (2002): Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203207833
Whitehead, A. N. (1929): Process and Reality, an Essay in Cosmology. The University Press.
Zahle, J. and F. Collin (2014): Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05344-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Roberto Frega
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
