Institutional Identity

Authors

  • Joshua Rust Stetson University

Keywords:

identity, social kinds, institutions, social ontology, Derek Parfit

Abstract

For some sufficiently long-standing institutions, such as the English Crown, there is no single thread, whether specified in terms of constitutive rules or assigned functions, that would connect the stages of that institution. Elizabeth II and Egbert are not connected by an unbroken chain of primogeniture and they have importantly different powers and functions. Derek Parfit famously sought to illuminate his account of personal identity by comparing a person to a club. If Parfit could use our intuitions about clubs to help motivate his neo-Lockean account of personal identity over time, which resists the idea that personal identity requires a common psychological thread, then I argue that an adapted version of his account of identity might, in turn, be reapplied to clubs and other institutions, such as the Crown.

References

Almäng, Jan (2016): “Legal Facts and Dependence on Representations.” In: Journal of Social Ontology 2. No. 1, p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0027

Boyd, Richard (1991): “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” In: Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 61. No. 1/2, p. 127–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385837

Epstein, Brian (2015a): The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. 1 edition. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001

Epstein, Brian (2015b): “A Framework for Social Ontology.” In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46, No. 2, p. 147–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393115613494

Epstein, Brian (2017): “What Are Social Groups? Their Metaphysics and How to Classify Them.” In: Synthese p. 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1387-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1387-y

Fein, Helen (1993): Genocide: A Sociological Perspective. New York: SAGE Publications.

Gilbert, Margaret (1990): “Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon.” In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15, p. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1990.tb00202.x

Guala, Francesco (2016): Understanding Institutions: The Science and Philosophy of Living Together. 1 edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400880911

Guala, Francesco and Frank Hindriks (2015): “A Unified Social Ontology.” In: The Philosophical Quarterly 65. No. 259, p. 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu072

Hacking, Ian (1999): The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (2012): The Concept of Law. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199644704.001.0001

Hauswald, Rico (2018): “Institution Types and Institution Tokens: An Unproblematic Distinction?” In: The Philosophy of the Social Sciences, November. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118799054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118799054

Hindriks, Frank (2012): “But Where Is the University?” In: Dialectica 66. No. 1, p. 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2012.01289.x

Hull, David (1992): “Individual.” In: E. Fox Keller and E. A. Lloyd (Eds.): Keywords in Evolutionarily Biology, 181–187. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (2015): “Three Kinds of Social Kinds.” In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90. No. 1, p. 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12020

Levene, Mark (2008): Genocide in the Age of the Nation State: Volume 1: The Meaning of Genocide. London; New York: I.B. Tauris.

Ludwig, Kirk (2017): From Plural to Institutional Agency: Collective Action II. 1 edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789994.001.0001

Merton, Robert King (1968): Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

Parfit, Derek (1987): Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parfit, Derek (1995): “The Unimportance of Identity.” In: H. Harris (Ed.): Identity, 13–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rust, Joshua (2017): “On the Relation between Institutional Statuses and Technical Artifacts: A Proposed Taxonomy of Social Kinds.” In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 25. No. 5, p. 704–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2017.1381139

Searle, John R. (1969): Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Searle, John R. (1995): The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

Searle, John R. (2010): Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford UK; New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001

“To Have and to Hold” (2015): The Economist, April. https://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21648171-far-declining-family-firms-will-remain-important-feature-global-capitalism.

van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980): The Scientific Image. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198244274.001.0001

Weber, Max (1978): Economy and Society; An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Weinberg, Shelley (2016): Consciousness in Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749011.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

How to Cite

Rust, Joshua. 2019. “Institutional Identity”. Journal of Social Ontology 5 (1). Vienna, Austria:13-34. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6798.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Joshua Rust

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.