Contradiction Club: Dialetheism and the Social World
Keywords:
dialetheism, social ontology, nonclassical logic, metaphysics, institutionsAbstract
Putative examples of true contradictions in the social world have been given by dialetheists such as Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Val Plumwood. However, we feel that it has not been decisively argued that these examples are in fact true contradictions rather than merely apparent. In this paper we adopt a new strategy to show that there are some true contradictions in the social world, and hence that dialetheism is correct. The strategy involves showing that a group of sincere dialetheists can, given an appropriately formed institution, bootstrap contradictions into existence. We discuss objections and consider the implications of this finding for debates over logic.
References
Beall, Jc (2009): Spandrels of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268733.001.0001
Beall, Jc (2011): “Dialetheists against Pinocchio”. In: Analysis 71. No. 4, p. 689–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anr084
Beall, Jc (2017): “Do Inconsistent Laws Deliver Gluts”. In: H. P. Glenn and L. D. Smith (Eds.): Law and the New Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227329.011
Chihara, Charles (1979): “The Semantic Paradoxes: A Diagnostic Investigation”. In: Philosophical Review 88, p. 590–618. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184846
Cobreros, Pablo (2011): “Paraconsistent Vagueness: A Positive Argument”. In: Synthese 183. No. 2, p. 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9760-0
Eldridge-Smith, Peter (2011): “Pinocchio against the Dialetheists”. In: Analysis 71. No. 2, p. 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anr007
Eldridge-Smith, Peter and Eldridge-Smith Veronique (2010): “The Pinocchio Paradox”. In: Analysis 70. No. 2, p. 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp173
Epstein, Brian (2016): “A Framework for Social Ontology”. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46. No. 2, p. 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393115613494
Gilbert, Margaret (1989): On Social Facts. Princeton University Press.
Hyde, Dominic and Mark Colyvan (2008): “Paraconsistent Vagueness: Why Not?” In: Australasian Journal of Logic 6, p. 107–121. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v6i0.1798
Priest, Graham (1985): “Inconsistencies in Motion”. In: American Philosophical Quarterly 22. No. 4, p. 339–346.
Priest, Graham (2006): In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.0001
Priest, Graham (2017): “Where Laws conflict”. In: H. P. Glenn and L. D. Smith (Eds.): Law and the New Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227329.009
Routley, Richard and Val Plumwood (1989): “Moral Dilemmas and the Logic of Deontic Notions”. In: Graham Priest, Richard Routley and Jean Norman (Eds.): Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Munich: Philosophia, p. 653–702.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
