Response to Critics
Keywords:
group duties, group agency, group responsibilityAbstract
This is a response to the critial comments by Anne Schwenkenbecher, Olle Blomberg, Bill Wringe and Gunnar Björnsson.
References
Collins, S. 2019. Group Duties: Their Existence and Their Implications for Individuals. Oxford: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840275.001.0001
Hakli, R., K. Miller, and R. Tuomela. 2010. “Two Kinds of We-Reasoning.” Economics and Philosophy 26 (3): 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267110000386.
Schwenkenbecher, A. 2019. “Collective Moral Obligations: ‘We-Reasoning’ and the Perspective of the Deliberating Agent.” The Monist 102 (2): 151–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz003.
Shoemaker, D. 2011. “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility.” Ethics 121 (3): 602–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/659003.
Shoemaker, D. 2015. Responsibility from the Margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715672.001.0001
Wringe, B. 2016. “Collective Obligations: Their Existence, Their Explanatory Power, and Their Supervenience on the Obligations of Individuals.” European Journal of Philosophy 24: 472–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12076.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.