The Epistemology of Group Duties: What We Know and What We Ought to do


  • Anne Schwenkenbecher Murdoch University


In Group Duties, Stephanie Collins proposes a ‘tripartite’ social ontology of groups as obligation-bearers. Producing a unified theory of group obligations that reflects our messy social reality is challenging and this ‘three-sizes-fit-all’ approach promises clarity but does not always keep that promise. I suggest considering the epistemic level as primary in determining collective obligations, allowing for more fluidity than the proposed tripartite ontology of collectives, coalitions and combinations.


Aas, S. 2015. “Distributing Collective Obligation.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (3): 1–23.

Bazargan-Forward, S., and D. Tollefsen, eds. (2020). Routledge Handbook on Collective Responsibility. New York: Routledge.

Björnsson, G. 2014. Essentially Shared Obligations. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38: 103–20.

Bratman, M. E. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. New York: Oxford University Press.

Collins, S. 2013. “Collectives’ Duties and Collectivisation Duties.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2): 231–248.

Collins, S. 2019. Group Duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodin, R. E. 2012. “Excused by the Unwillingness of Others?.” Analysis 72 (1): 18–24.

Hakli, R., K. Miller, and R. Tuomela. 2010. “Two Kinds of We-Reasoning.” Economics and Philosophy 26 (3): 291–320.

Held, V. 1970. “Can a Random Collection of Individuals be Morally Responsible?.” Journal of Philosophy 67 (14): 471–481.

Hess, K., V. Igneski, and T. L. Isaacs, eds. (2018). Collectivity: Ontology, Ethics, and Social Justice. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Lawford-Smith, H. 2012. “The Feasibility of Collectives’ Actions.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3): 453–467.

List, C., Pettit, P. 2011. Group Agency The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. New York: Oxford University Press, Oxford.

May, L., and S. Hoffman. 1991. Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Pinkert, F. 2014. “What We Together Can (Be Required to) Do.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 38 (1): 187–202.

Schwenkenbecher, A. 2014. “Joint Moral Duties.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1): 58–74.

Schwenkenbecher, A. 2019. “Collective Moral Obligations: ‘We-Reasoning’ and the Perspective Of The Deliberating Agent.” The Monist 102 (2): 151–171.

Schwenkenbecher, A. 2020a. “Structural Injustice and Massively Shared Obligations.” Journal of Applied Philosophy.

Schwenkenbecher, A. 2020b. Getting Our Act Together: A Theory of Collective Moral Obligations. Routledge.

Woodard, C. 2017. “Three Conceptions of Group-Based Reasons.” Journal of Social Ontology 3: 107–27.

Wringe, B. 2005. “Needs, Rights, and Collective Obligations.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80 (57): 187–207.

Wringe, B. 2010. “Global Obligations and the Agency Objection.” Ratio 23 (2): 217–231.

Wringe, B. 2016. “Collective Obligations: Their Existence, Their Explanatory Power, and Their Supervenience on the Obligations of Individuals.” Journal of Philosophy 24 (2): 472–497.




How to Cite

Schwenkenbecher, Anne. 2022. “The Epistemology of Group Duties: What We Know and What We Ought to Do”. Journal of Social Ontology 6 (1). Vienna, Austria:91-100.



Book Symposium