The Problem of the First Belief: Group Agents and Responsibility
Keywords:
Christian List, collective beliefs, collective responsibility, group agency, moral personhood, Philip Pettit, philosophy, social ontologyAbstract
Attributing moral responsibility to an agent requires that the agent is a capable member of a moral community. Capable members of a moral community are often thought of as moral reasoners (or moral persons) and, thus, to attribute moral responsibility to collective agents would require showing that they are capable of moral reasoning. It is argued here that those theories that understand collective reasoning and collective moral agency in terms of collective decision-making and commitment – as is arguably the case with Christian List and Philip Pettit’s theory of group agency – face the so-called “problem of the first belief” that threatens to make moral reasoning impossible for group agents. This paper introduces three possible solutions to the problem and discusses the effects that these solutions have in regard to the possibility of attributing moral responsibility to groups.
References
Block, N. 1980. “Troubles with Functionalism.” In Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1, edited by N. Block, 268–305. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2111.003.0006
Bratman, M. 2014. Shared Agency. A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001
Collins, S. 2013. “Collectives’ Duties and Collectivization Duties.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2): 231–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2012.717533.
Collins, S. 2019. Group Duties: Their Existence and their Implications for Individuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840275.001.0001
Dennett, D. 1976. “Conditions of Personhood.” In The Identities of Persons, edited by A. Oksenberg Rorty, 175–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.
French, P. 1979. “The Corporation as a Moral Person.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 207–15, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006020214228.10.1023/A:1006020214228
French, P. 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/fren90672
Gilbert, M. 1992. On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214627
Gilbert, M. 2013. Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.001.0001
Goodman, M. F. 1992. “A Sufficient Condition for Personhood.” In The Personalist Forum, Spring 1992 Supplement: Studies in Personalist Philosophy. Proceedings of the Conference on Persons, Vol. 8. No. 1, 75–81. University of Illinois Press.
Haksar, V. 2005 “Moral Agents.” In The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 692, edited by E. Craig. London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-L049-1
Hindriks, F. 2008. “The Status Account of Corporate Agents.” In Concepts of Sharedness: New Essays on Collective Intentionality, 119–44, edited by B. Schmid, K. Schulte-Ostermann, and N. Psarros. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110327175.119
Hirvonen, O. 2017a. “Group Personhood in the Contemporary Social Ontology.” In Mind, Collective Agency, Norms: Essays on Social Ontology. Berichte aus der Philosophie, 80–3, edited by P. Salis and G. Seddone. Germany: Shaker Verlag GmbH.
Hirvonen, O. 2017b. “Groups as Persons? A Suggestion for a Hegelian Turn.” Journal of Social Ontology 3 (2): 143–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2016-0019.
Korsgaard, C. 2004. “Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals.” Tanner Lectures on Human Values 24: 77–110.
Kusch, M. 2014. “The Metaphysics and Politics of Corporate Personhood.” Erkenntnis 79 (9): 1587–600, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9630-0.
Laitinen, A. 2007. “Sorting Out Aspects of Personhood. Capacities, Normativity and Recognition.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (5–7): 248–70.
Laitinen, A. 2014. “Group Minds and the Problem of the First Belief.” Balkan Journal of Philosophy 6 (1): 43–8, https://doi.org/10.5840/bjp2014616.
Lawford-Smith, H. 2019. Not In Their Name. Are Citizens Culpable For Their States’ Actions? Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833666.001.0001
List, C. 2014. “Three Kinds of Collective Attitudes.” Erkenntnis 79 (Supplement 9): 1601–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9631-z.
List, C., and P. Pettit. 2004. “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared.” Synthese 140 (1): 207–35, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000029950.50517.59.10.1023/B:SYNT.0000029950.50517.59
List, C., and P. Pettit. 2011. Group Agency. The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001
Malle, B. 2010. “The Social and Moral Cognition of Group Agents.” Journal of Law and Policy 19 (1): 95–136.
McBride, C. 2013. Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pettit, P. 1996. The Common Mind. An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195106458.001.0001
Pettit, P. 1998. “Defining and Defending Social Holism.” Philosophical Explorations 1 (3): 169–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/10001998098538698.
Pettit, P. 2003. “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” In Socializing Metaphysics. The Nature of Social Reality, edited by F. F. Schmitt, 167–93. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Pettit, P. 2007 “Responsibility Incorporated.” Ethics 117 (2): 171–201, https://doi.org/10.1086/510695.
Rovane, C. 1998. The Bounds of Agency. An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822423
Schwitzgebel, E. 2015. “Belief.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/belief/ (accessed March 29, 2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839065.ch2
Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
Smith, L. 2018. “The Curious Case of Ronald McDonald’s Claim to Rights: An Ontological Account of Differences in Group and Individual Person Rights.” Journal of Social Ontology 4 (1): 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2016-0042.
Strawson, P. 1968. Studies in the Philosophy of Though and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tollefsen, D. 2015. Groups as Agents. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tuomela, R. 2003. The Philosophy of Social Practices. A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487446
Tuomela, R. 2007. The Philosophy of Sociality. The Shared Point of View. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001
Wringe, B. 2020. “Global Obligations, Collective Capacities, and ‘Ought Implies Can’.” Philosophical Studies, 177: 1523–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01272-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
