Property Rights with Respect to Modern Money: A Libertarian Justification
Keywords:
property rights, libertarianism, money, Post-Keynesian economics, credit, theory of moneyAbstract
The traditional Lockean justification of property rights has been argued to be no longer valid in a world in which much wealth does not derive from acquisitions of natural resources, and in which much property, such as money, is intangible. This means that libertarians need to reconsider whether and why property rights are justified for objects that fall outside of the scope of the Lockean justification. This paper gives a justification of property rights in relation to modern money, which uses the self-ownership principle as its central premise. Since modern money is a form of credit, I start with a justification of credit property rights. I then consider both money under gold convertibility and present-day fiat systems, showing that the justification of credit property rights remains valid under these conditions.
References
Barnett, R. E. 1986. “Contract Remedies and Inalienable Rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1): 179–202, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000479.
Blanchard, O. J. 2018. “Neoclassical Synthesis.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 9407–12. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1218
Child, J. W. 1990. “The Moral Foundations of Intangible Property.” The Monist 73 (4): 578–600, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19907346.
Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Studies in Marxism and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521270
De Nederlandsche, Bank. 2015. “Centrale bank houdt vinger aan de pols bij geldschepping.” https://www.dnb.nl/nieuws/nieuwsoverzicht-en-archief/dnbulletin-2015/dnb325255.jsp (accessed October 3, 2019).
Fetter, F. W. 1965. Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy, 1797–1875. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fried, B. H. 2004. “Left-Libertarianism: A Review Essay.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (1): 66–92, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00005.x.
Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
Graziani, A. 2003. The Monetary Theory of Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493546
Greenbaum, S. I., A. V. Thakor, and A. W. A. Boot, eds. 2016. Contemporary Financial Intermediation. 3rd ed., 23–53. San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405196-6.00002-1
Hayek, F. A. 1976. Denationalisation of Money. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Honoré, A. M. 1961. “Ownership.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: A Collaborative Work, edited by A. G. Guest, 107–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ingham, G. 2004. The Nature of Money. Cambridge: Polity.
Jakab, Z., and M. Kumhof. 2018. “Banks are not Intermediaries of Loanable Funds.” Working Paper No. 761. Bank of England, https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/working-paper/2018/banks-are-not-intermediaries-of-loanable-funds-facts-theory-and-evidence (Last updated June, 2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274706
Juniper, J., T. P. Sharpe, and M. J. Watts. 2014. “Modern Monetary Theory: Contributions and Critics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 37 (2): 281–307, https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477370205.
Keynes, J. M. [1930] 1971. “A Treatise on Money, Vol. 1: The Pure Theory of Money.” In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, 5, edited by D. E. Moggridge. London: Royal Economic Society.
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
Kumhof, M., J. G. Allen, W. Bateman, R. M. Lastra, S. Gleeson, and S. T. Omarova. 2020. “Central Bank Money: Liability, Asset, or Equity of the Nation?” Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper 20–46, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730608.
Lavoie, M. 2003. “A Primer on Endogenous Credit-Money.” In Modern Theories of Money: The Nature and Role of Money in Capitalist Economies, edited by L.-P. Rochon, and S. Rossi, 506–43. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lavoie, M. 2013. “The Monetary and Fiscal Nexus of Neo-Chartalism: A Friendly Critique.” Journal of Economic Issues 47 (1): 1–32, https://doi.org/10.2753/JEISS21-3624470101.10.2753/JEI0021-3624470101
Mankiw, N. G. 2010. Macroeconomics, 7th ed. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Menger, K. 1892. “On the Origin of Money.” The Economic Journal 2 (6): 239–55, https://doi.org/10.2307/2956146.
Mishkin, F. S. 2011. The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets, 4th Canadian ed. Toronto: Pearson Canada.
Mitchell Innes, A. 1913. “What Is Money?” Banking Law Journal 30: 377–409.
Moller, D. 2017. “Property and the Creation of Value.” Economics and Philosophy 33 (1): 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267115000395.
Nesiba, R. F. 2013. “Do Institutionalists and Post-keynesians Share a Common Approach to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)?” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies 10 (1): 44–60, https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2013.01.05.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Otsuka, M. 1998. “Self-Ownership and Equality: A Lockean Reconciliation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 (1): 65–92, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00061.x.10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00061.x
Parguez, A., and M. Seccareccia. 2002. “The Credit Theory of Money: The Monetary Circuit Approach.” In What Is Money?, edited by J. Smithin. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rochon, L.-P., and S. Rossi. 2003a. “Introduction.” In Modern Theories of Money: The Nature and Role of Money in Capitalist Economies, edited by L.-P. Rochon, and S. Rossi. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rochon, L.-P., and S. Rossi, eds. 2003b. Modern Theories of Money: The Nature and Role of Money in Capitalist Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rothbard, M. 1998. The Ethics of Liberty. New York, NY: New York University Press. Originally published in 1982.
Scanlon, T. 1976. “Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1): 3–25.
Schumpeter, J. A. [1954] 1994. History of Economic Analysis. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983911
Sheard, P. 2013. “Repeat after Me: Banks Cannot and Do Not Lend Out Reserves.” Standard and Poor’s Rating Services. Also available at https://web.archive.org/web/20130902234622/http://www.standardandpoors.com/spf/upload/Ratings_US/Repeat_After_Me_8_14_13.pdf.
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1904. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.
Smithin, J. 2002. What Is Money? New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203072691
Sobol, N. L. 2016. “Charging the Poor: Criminal Justice Debt and Modern-Day Debtors’ Prisons.” Maryland Law Review 75: 486.
Thornton, H. [1802] 1939. An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain, edited with an introduction by F. A. von Hayek. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Vallentyne, P., H. Steiner, and M. Otsuka. 2005. “Why Left-Libertarianism Is Not Incoherent, Indeterminate, or Irrelevant: A Reply to Fried.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2): 201–15, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00030.x.
Waldron, J. 1993. “Property, Justification and Need.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 6 (2): 185–215, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900001909.
Wray, L. R. 1998. Understanding Modern Money: The Key to Full Employment and Price Stability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wray, L. R. 2007. “Endogenous Money: Structuralist and Horizontalist.” Working Paper No. 512, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31702.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
