The Epistemology of Collective Testimony

Authors

  • Leo Townsend University of Vienna

Keywords:

collective testimony, collective belief, collective intentionality, trust, collective epistemology

Abstract

In this paper, I explore what gives collective testimony its epistemic credentials, through a critical discussion of three competing accounts of the epistemology of collective testimony. According to the first view, collective testimony inherits its epistemic credentials from the beliefs the testimony expresses—where this can be seen either as the beliefs of all or some of the group’s members, or as the beliefs of group itself. The second view denies any necessary connection to belief, claiming instead that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the reliability or truth-conduciveness of the statement that expresses the testimony. Finally, the third view claims that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the fact that it involves undertaking a collective commitment to trustworthiness, which makes the group susceptible to rebuke and blame if its testimony is not trustworthy. I argue that this last account holds the most promise for preserving what is distinctive about testimonial knowledge while still underwriting a robust epistemology of collective testimony.

References

Anscombe, E. 1979. “What Is It to Believe Someone?” In Rationality and Religious Belief, edited by C. F. Delaney. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Beatty, J. 2006. “Masking Disagreement Among Experts.” Episteme 3 (1–2): 52–67. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.52

Coady, A. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Faulkner, P. 2011. Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589784.001.0001

Fricker, M. 2012. “Group Testimony? The Making of A Collective Good Informant.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84: 249–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00565.x

Gilbert, M. 1987. “Modelling Collective Belief.” Synthese 73 (1): 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485446

Gilbert, M. 2002. “Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups.” In Chapter 6 in Gilbert, Margaret (2014): Joint Commitment, New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.003.0007

Gilbert, M. 2006. A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199274959.001.0001

Gilbert, M. 2014. Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.001.0001

Graham, P. 2015. “Testimony as Speech Act, Testimony as Source.” In Moral and Intellectual Virtues in Western and Chinese Philosophy: The Turn toward Virtue, edited by S. Mi and Slote. London: Routledge.

Hawley, K. 2017. “Trustworthy Groups and Organisations.” In The Philosophy of Trust, edited by P. Faulkner and T. Simpson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732549.003.0014

Hinchman, E. 2005. “Telling as Inviting to Trust.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3): 562–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00415.x

Hinchman, E. 2014. “Assurance and Warrant.” Philosophers’ Imprint 14 (17).

Huebner, B. 2014. Macrocognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001

Kulik, J., and P. Carlino. 1987. “The Effect of Verbal Commitment and Treatment Choice on Medication Compliance in a Pediatric Setting.” Journal of Behavioral Medicine 10 (4): 367–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846476

Lackey, J. 2006. “The Nature of Testimony.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2): 177–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219162.003.0002

Lackey, J. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219162.001.0001

Lackey, J. 2014. “A Deflationary Account of Group Testimony.” In Essays in Collective Epistemology, edited by Lackey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665792.003.0004

Lackey, J. 2018. “Group Assertion.” Erkenntnis 83 (1): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199656608.003.0005

Lackey, J. 2020. “Group Belief: Lessons from Lies and Bullshit.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 94 (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199656608.003.0002

List, C., and P. Pettit. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001

Ludwig, K. 2014. “Proxy Agency in Collective Action.” Noûs 48 (1): 75–105. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768571-7

McMyler, B. 2011. Testimony, Trust, and Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794331.001.0001

Moran, R. 2005a. “Getting Told and Being Believed.” Philosophers’ Imprint 5: 1–29.

Moran, R. 2005b. “Problems of Sincerity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 341–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2005.00179.x

Pettit, P. 2003. “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” In Socialising Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality, edited by F. Schmitt. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Pettit, P. 2008. Made with Words. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Quinton, A. 1975. “The Presidential Address: Social Objects.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/76.1.1

Schmitt, F. 1994. “The Justification of Group Beliefs.” In Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, edited by Schmitt, 257–87. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Schultz, W., S. Oskamp, and T. Mainieri. 1995. “Who Recycles and When? A Review of Personal and Situational Factors.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 15 (2): 105–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90019-5

Schwartz, J., et al.. 2014. “Healthier by Precommitment.” Psychological Science 25 (2): 538–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/e513702014-041

Tollefsen, D. 2002. “Organizations as True Believers.” Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3): 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/0047-2786.00149

Tollefsen, D. 2004. “Collective Epistemic Agency.” Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20042015

Tollefsen, D. 2007. “Group Testimony.” Social Epistemology 21 (3): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701674163

Tollefsen, D. 2009. “WIKIPEDIA and the Epistemology of Testimony.” Episteme 6 (1): 8–24. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1742360008000518

Tollefsen, D. 2011. “Groups as Rational Sources.” In Collective Epistemology, edited by S. Schmid and Weber, 20–11. Ontos. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322583.11

Tollefsen, D. 2015. Groups as Agents. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Tuomela, R. 1992. “Group Beliefs.” Synthese 91 (3): 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618204-006

Wanderer, J. 2013. “Testimony and the Interpersonal.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (1): 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2013.767508

Zagzebski, L. 2012. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles