How to Project a Socially Constructed Sexual Orientation

Authors

  • Peter Finocchiaro Wuhan University

Keywords:

sexual orientation, historical projection, social construction, social metaphysics, Iris Einheuser, modality

Abstract

Was bisexuality a widespread feature of ancient Greek society? This question is an instance of cross-cultural projection – of taking the means through which people are categorized in one culture and applying it to members of another. It’s widely held by those who think that sexual orientation is socially constructed that its projection poses a problem. In this paper, I offer a more careful analysis of this alleged problem. To analyze projection, I adapt Iris Einheuser’s substratum-carving model of conventionalism to fit the specific needs of social construction (and social metaphysics more broadly). Using this model, I show that projection is conceptually coherent, and so does not for that reason pose any problem. Along the way, I identify some of the epistemic difficulties facing projection. While these difficulties are formidable, they are not substantially affected by the constructivist claim. I therefore conclude that there is no unique problem facing the projection of a socially constructed sexual orientation.

References

Ásta. 2018. Categories We Live By: The Construction of Sex, Gender, Race, and Other Social Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190256791.001.0001

Bostock v. Clayton County. 2020. 590 U.S. Supreme Court.

Boswell, J. 1989. “Revolutions, Universals, and Sexual Categories.” In Hidden from History: Reclaiming the Gay and Lesbian Past, edited by M. B. Duberman, M. Vicinus, and G. Chauncey Jr., 17–36. London: Penguin Books.

Corvino, J. 2013. What’s Wrong with Homosexuality? Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee570

Dembroff, R. 2016. “What is Sexual Orientation?” Philosophers’ Imprint 16: 1–27.

Dembroff, R. 2018. “Real Talk on the Metaphysics of Gender.” Philosophical Topics 46: 21–50, https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201846212.

Díaz-León, E. “Sexual Orientations: The Desire View.” In Feminist Philosophy of Mind, edited by K. Maitra, and J. McWeeny. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).

Díaz-León, E. 2020. “Relativism and Race.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism, 265–71. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351052306-29

Einheuser, I. 2006. “Counterconventional Conditionals.” Philosophical Studies 127: 459–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7790-5.

Einheuser, I. 2009. “Some Remarks on ‘Language-Created Entities’.” Acta Analytica 24: 185–92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0052-6.

Einheuser, I. 2011. “Toward a Conceptualist Solution of the Grounding Problem.” Noûs 45: 300–14, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00765.x.

Epstein, B. 2014. “How Many Kinds of Glue Hold the Social World Together?” In Perspectives on Social Ontology and Social Cognition, Volume 4 of Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, edited by M. Gallotti, and J. Michael, 41–56. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9147-2_4

Epstein, S. 2015. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001

Finocchiaro, P. 2021. “High-Fidelity Metaphysics: Ideological Parsimony in Theory Choice.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly: Online Early View.10.1111/papq.12349

Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume I. New York: Random House.

Glasgow, J. 2007. “Three Things Realist Constructionism About Race---or Anything Else---Can Do.” Journal of Social Philosophy 38: 554–68.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00398.x

Good, C., J. Arsonson, and J. A. Harder. 2008. “Problems in the Pipeline: Stereotype Threat and Women’s Achievement in High-Level Math Courses.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29: 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004.

Hacking, I. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp1z

Halperin, D. M. 1990. One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: And Other Essays on Greek Love. New York: Routledge.

Haslanger, S. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892631.001.0001

Hinsch, B. 1992. Passions of the Cut Sleeve: The Male Homosexual Tradition in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Katz, J. N. 1990. “The Invention of Heterosexuality.” Socialist Review 20: 7–34.

Khalidi, M. A. 2015. “Three Kinds of Social Kinds.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 96–112, https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12020.

LeVay, S. 2017. Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewin, E., and W. L. Leap, eds. 2002. Out in Theory: The Emergence of Lesbian and Gay Anthropology. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.10.5406/j.ctvvng2r

Lewis, D. 1979. “Attitudes de dicto and de se.” The Philosophical Review 88: 513–43, https://doi.org/10.2307/2184843.

Littman, R. J. 1970. “The Loves of Alcibiades.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 101: 263–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/2936053.

Mallon, R. 2004. “Passing, Traveling, and Reality: Social Constructionism and the Metaphysics of Race.” Noûs 38: 644–73, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2004.00487.x.

Mallon, R. 2016. The Construction of Human Kinds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755678.001.0001

McIntosh, M. 1968. “The Homosexual Role.” Social Problems 16: 182–92, https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1968.16.2.03a00050.

Miller, D. I., A. H. Eagly, and M. C. Linn. 2015. “Women’s Representation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science Stereotypes: Evidence from 66 Nations.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107: 631–44, https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005.

Millikan, R. G. 2014. “Deflating Socially Constructed Objects: What Thoughts Do to the World.” In Perspectives on Social Ontology and Social Cognition, Vol. 4, edited by M. Gallott, and J. Michael, 27–40. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9147-2_3

Ortiz, D. R. 1993. “Creating Controversy: Essentialism and Constructivism and the Politics of Gay Identity.” Virginia Law Review 79: 1833–57, https://doi.org/10.2307/1073388.

Ritchie, K. 2018. “Social Creationism and Social Groups.” In Collectivity: Ontology, Ethics, and Social Justice, edited by K. Hess, T. Isaacs, and V. Igneski, 13–34. London: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Robinson, M. 2017. “Two-Spirit and Bisexual People: Different Umbrella, Same Rain.” Journal of Bisexuality 17: 7–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1261266.

Root, M. 2000. “How We Divide the World.” Philosophy of Science 67: 628–39, https://doi.org/10.1086/392851.

Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.

Searle, J. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001

Spencer, S. J., C. M. Steele, and D. M. Quinn. 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 4–28, https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.

Stein, E. 1992. Forms of Desire: Sexual Orientation and the Social Constructionist Controversy. New York: Routledge.

Stein, E. 1999. The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stock, K. 2019. “Sexual Orientation: What is it?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119: 295–319, https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz015.

Thomasson, A. L. 2003. “Foundation for a Social Ontology.” ProtoSociology 18: 269–90, https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology200318/199.

Vance, C. S. 1989. “Social Construction Theory: Problems in the History of Sexuality.” In Homosexuality, Which Homosexuality?, 13–34. Amsterdam: An Dekker.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles